SALMANPK
5832
Your Questions
Aug 04, 2014,00:10 AM
So how does the dealer compete?
I really can't say how since I'm not in this line of work but as a student of business, social behavior and history I can say it will be tough going forward for dealers without the commitment and support of Seiko to promote and develop the brand. At the moment I can say some Independent watchmakers are far more prolific and effective at promoting themselves than GS which is bizarre considering the resources and size of Seiko.
We have to admit there is a serious problem with branding of the product. A Grand Seiko is also a Seiko (but cannot only be a Grand Seiko because the dials say Seiko and then Grand Seiko as well), Seiko can offer complicated, highly finished mechanical wrist watches under Credor and the Seiko Ananta lines, even though the complicated Ananta lines are made at the same Shizukuishi Watch Studio as the GS yet doesn't get the GS designation. Here is an example the SAEC001 Double Retrograde with Power Reserve Indicator and Day Indicator made at the Shizukuishi Watch Studio alongside the GS. It is a complicated wrist watch yet falls under the Ananta line and not GS. I am sure the quality of finish is slightly below the GS level but why not up the quality and call it a GS as well?
The most complicated wrist watch currently available under GS is a Chronograph. No Perpetual Calendars, No Tourbillons, No Minute Repeaters?? Seiko filed a Patent for a Tourbillon in 1998 and as far as I know has yet to bring one to the market yet Chinese watch making companies are pumping out Tourbillons every year by the thousands. It boggles the mind why GS hasn't come out with a Tourbillon yet made to its high standards of finishing and accuracy. I understand they had a focus on accuracy on the 1960s and 70s and saw no need for a Tourbillon to make a more accurate watch (i.e. the VFA) but the market has changed. People want pizzazz and gadgets and things that whirl around on the dial of their watches so they can be amused and show it to their nearest and dearest.
The dealers have a tough time justifying or explaining the Ananta line and the GS line. Seiko has to refine and decide whether it should keep the GS line and eliminate the Ananta line or the other way around but to keep both? To be honest I don't like the sound of the name "Ananta", I know it has some significance or the other but doesn't sound good to my ears or even to say it.
Then there is Credor. All the super high end complications (minute repeater), highly quality skeletonized pieces and others come under this umbrella. No plans to export any of them. I heard a line which is apropos from one of my new favorite shows "Halt and Catch Fire" recently which was along the lines of " And I learned if you wanna sell station wagons, you'd better have a sports car to park in the window"
Ananta, GS, Credor, Galante, High End Spring Drive Moonphase bring them under one umbrella, Spin it off into a separate Company (With One Brand Name) and Appoint a CEO with a Board. Maybe even consider setting up HQ for the newly spun off company in Switzerland while keeping the majority of the production facilities in Japan but at the same time set up an Atelier to benefit from the concentration of know how and skills in Switzerland and incorporate them into the higher end pieces.
So given the lack of focus, clarity and cross over pieces my sympathies are with the authorized dealers.
But then again what to do I know, I am sure the top executives at Seiko HQ know better.
How does he or she get our local business?
At the moment with the way things are, discount and try to give their customers a good deal to build up a relationship and interest in GS pieces. If things don't change it might take decades for GS to be established as a brand.
S
Pic Source: Google Images
This message has been edited by SALMANQ8 on 2014-08-04 00:16:47 This message has been edited by SALMANQ8 on 2014-08-04 00:27:16 This message has been edited by SALMANQ8 on 2014-08-04 00:32:44