I keep seeing 4.2 mm but also reports of 5.5 mm (for both the solid and display back...) Also I just noticed the ref may be different after all: Solid back is 145.8.79 and display is 145.8.79.s
I've been researching and pondering this for a while, it seems there are two variations of the original MUT (34mm with caliber 849), an earlier one which has the solid caseback and a later one (more commonly seen) with a sapphire caseback. Both reference numbers seem identical (145.8.79) Does anyone
if you look at what happens to them after Bvlgari acquired the names, sadly, you may see what could happen... Daniel Roth watches often go unnoticed on auction sites and the new pieces are not close to the level of innovation the brands had before.
However, my particular example was 39mm which was very good for my 6.25 inch wrist. The dial is interesting but I think it's a matter of taste, the 273 and 181 have plain dials which I think suit the overall sober characteristic of the watch better than the "monogram" style dial mine has. There's no
Comes on original curved end alligator strap (8/10 condition) with deployant buckle. Comes in original wooden box. Runs strong around 300 degrees amplitude, very good condition. Accuracy is very good around +4 seconds/day on wrist. Stainless Steel with a beautiful silver guilloch dial. Original ret